Luke's Gospel

 

Question:  What is the age of the oldest extant manuscript of Luke’s Gospel?

 

Wikipedia: New Testament manuscripts [edit]

Folio 41v from Codex Alexandrinus contains the Gospel of Luke with decorative tailpiece.

See also: Lists of New Testament manuscripts

The New Testament has been preserved in more manuscripts than any other ancient work of literature, with over 5,800 complete or fragmented Greek manuscripts catalogued, 10,000 Latin manuscripts and 9,300 manuscripts in various other ancient languages including SyriacSlavicGothicEthiopicCopticNubian, and Armenian.  The dates of these manuscripts range from c. 125 (the 𝔓52 papyrus, oldest copy of John fragment) to the introduction of printing in Germany in the 15th century. [citation needed]

Often, especially in monasteries, a manuscript cache was little more than a former manuscript recycling centre, where imperfect and incomplete copies of manuscripts were stored while the monastery or scriptorium decided what to do with them. [citation needed]  There were several options.  The first was to simply "wash" the manuscript and reuse it.  Such reused manuscripts were called palimpsests and were very common in the ancient world until the Middle Ages.  One notable palimpsest is the Archimedes Palimpsest. When washing was no longer an option, the second choice was burning.  Since the manuscripts contained the words of Christ, they were thought to have had a level of sanctity; [citation needed] burning them was considered more reverent than simply throwing them into a garbage pit, which occasionally happened (as in the case of Oxyrhynchus 840).  The third option was to leave them in what has become known as a manuscript gravesite.  When scholars come across manuscript caches, such as at Saint Catherine's Monastery in the Sinai (the source of the Codex Sinaiticus), or Saint Sabbas Monastery outside Bethlehem, they are finding not libraries but storehouses of rejected texts [citation needed] sometimes kept in boxes or back shelves in libraries due to space constraints.  The texts were unacceptable because of their scribal errors and contain corrections inside the lines[3] possibly evidence that monastery scribes compared them to a master text. In addition, texts thought to be complete and correct but that had deteriorated from heavy usage or had missing folios would also be placed in the caches.  Once in a cache, insects and humidity would often contribute to the continued deterioration of the documents.

Comment: There has recently been found a complete hand written copy of the Bible, which has been tentatively dated to approx. 800AD, which apparently conforms to the Dead Sea Scrolls, which are dated to approx. BC300.

 

If you have questions or comments, please click here. 

Or go to Chapters 1 to 22  or

Subjectindex  or

SUBJECTS GROUPED or

www.revelationsmessage.co.uk